A New York campaign led by a 911 supervisorPassed Senate + Assembly · Ask your local officials to support 911 →

THE LEGISLATION

A fair choice after 25 years of qualifying service.

A.9162A/S.7635B would let eligible public-safety dispatchers and emergency-communications professionals participate in a 25-year retirement plan when their public employer chooses to offer it.

✓ Assembly passed✓ Senate passed 60–0Awaiting delivery to the Governor

CURRENT STATUS

Both houses have passed the measure.

The official record does not yet show delivery to the Governor. The records reviewed do not show a signature or veto. The campaign is asking Governor Hochul to support the measure and sign it when it reaches her desk.

Last checked September 9, 2026
Official Senate and Assembly records remain the authoritative source. This is a check date, not a new legislative action.

Senate

S.7635B

Senator Christopher J. Ryan is the sponsor. The Senate page contains the bill text, vote, current status, and Final Fiscal Note 2026-40.

View official Senate record ↗

SECONDARY ACTION

Ask your lawmakers to keep the measure moving.

The Senate and Assembly have passed the measure, but individual votes varied. Check the official record, then ask your representatives to support delivery and Governor action.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Get clear answers.

The official bill text and each employer's decision will control eligibility and participation.

Open the employer and member implementation guide →
What would the measure do?

It would create an optional 25-year retirement path for eligible 911 workers. A public employer must choose to offer it.

Who may qualify?

The B text names public safety dispatchers, public safety telecommunicators, 911 operators, communications officers, police communication technicians, emergency services operators, and emergency services dispatchers. It also lets the Comptroller recognize differently named positions that comprehend the same duties and responsibilities. A title alone does not decide eligibility; consult the official text and NYSLRS.

Would the plan be automatic?

No. An eligible public employer would have to obtain a NYSLRS cost estimate, adopt a resolution, and file a certified copy with the Comptroller. The electing employer would pay the cost attributable to the benefit.

Would the proposed plan have a minimum retirement age?

No. The proposed benefit is based on qualifying service and sets no minimum retirement age. As an illustration, uninterrupted qualifying service beginning at 18 could reach 25 years at age 43. That does not guarantee eligibility; the enacted law, employer election, NYSLRS, title, duties, service, retirement system, and individual record would control.

Why does the campaign discuss Tier 6—and what about Tiers 4 and 5?

Tier 6 is the clearest regular-plan example because its full-benefit age is generally 63 and early retirement generally carries a permanent reduction. The bill is not Tier 6-only. Regular Tier 4 and Tier 5 rules differ, and special plans or individual records can change the result. See the sourced Tier 4/5/6 comparison.

What does the final fiscal note estimate?

Final Fiscal Note 2026-40 estimates that an electing employer's annual contribution would increase by 7% of salary paid to affected members. It estimates a past-service cost that varies by employer but averages approximately 30% of affected-member salary, payable once or over five or ten years, plus administrative costs. The statewide number of affected members is not readily determined; an employer roster would be used to calculate its exact estimate.

Would an individual member have a choice?

The bill provides a written, irrevocable individual election for members covered under Article 14. It must be filed with the Comptroller within one year after the employer election or within one year after entering eligible employment, whichever is later. Members should rely on NYSLRS and the enacted law for individual guidance.

Does the campaign call it cost-free?

No. The electing employer would pay the cost attributable to the benefit. The campaign describes it as an optional employer decision, not a free benefit or a statewide mandate.

Would this guarantee retiree health coverage?

No. The measure addresses retirement-system eligibility and pension benefits; it does not create or guarantee retiree health insurance. Health coverage is separate and depends on the employer, any applicable contract, and governing rules.

Is 25 years a medical cutoff?

No. Twenty-five years is the policy threshold chosen by the Legislature. Retirement is one workforce policy, not a substitute for safe staffing, confidential mental-health care, peer support, or crisis services.

Is this a government website?

No. This is an independently organized campaign led by a New York 911 supervisor. As of August 24, 2026, Casey reports approximately $70 in direct campaign expenses paid personally. The itemized costs, mixed-use ChatGPT spending, untracked volunteer time, limited workplace-resource use, and lack of claimed formal agency sponsorship are disclosed on the About page.